Sahawatthanakit (1988) Co., Ltd.
SAHAWATTHANAKIT(1988) · Make It Smart
Back to all articles
Sahawatthanakit (1988) Engineering Team

Marine Coating Im2 — Choosing epoxy mastic vs chlorinated rubber vs coal tar for Thai offshore work

Compare marine coatings for ship hull, dock, offshore structure in the splash zone — ISO 12944 Im2 specification, DFT, salt spray performance + Thai DIW environmental rules

Marine CoatingISO 12944Im2Chlorinated RubberCoal Tar EpoxySplash ZoneAnti-corrosionDIW
Painter applying epoxy mastic on offshore platform splash zone — chlorinated rubber topcoat

Photo by Unsplash

สรุป (TL;DR)

Compare marine coatings for ship hull, dock, offshore structure in the splash zone — ISO 12944 Im2 specification, DFT, salt spray performance + Thai DIW environmental rules

What Is ISO 12944 Im2

ISO 12944-2 divides corrosion environments into:

  • C1-C5 — atmospheric (rural, urban, industrial, coastal, offshore)
  • CX — extreme (offshore beyond C5)
  • Im1 — fresh water immersion
  • Im2 — sea water + sea water splash zone
  • Im3 — soil immersion (buried)

Im2 = the most frequently required class in Thai marine projects — ship hull above + below waterline, dock pile, offshore platform splash zone, sea water intake structure, jetty + pier.

3 Main Coating Systems

1. Chlorinated Rubber (CR)

Spec:

  • Single-pack, solvent-borne
  • DFT 75-200μm/coat (typically 3-4 coats total)
  • Cure: solvent evaporation 6-24 hr
  • Operating temp: -20°C to 70°C

Sweet spot: ship hull above water, splash zone topcoat, refurbishment.

Advantages:

  • Cures at low temperatures — suitable for winter / cold ambient
  • Good salt spray resistance
  • Recoatable for up to 6 months without sanding
  • Single-pack — minimum waste

Limitations:

  • Low DFT per coat — requires many coats
  • No immersion beyond the splash zone (Im2 max)
  • Solvent-borne — high VOC

2. Coal Tar Epoxy (CTE)

Spec:

  • 2K (amine/polyamide cure)
  • DFT 200-500μm/coat
  • Operating temp: -20°C to 95°C
  • Volume solids 55-75%

Sweet spot: buried pipe, storage tank lining, sewer manhole, dock pile underwater.

Advantages:

  • Best barrier protection in the group
  • High DFT/coat → fewer coats → faster project
  • Withstands immersion Im2 + Im3

Limitations:

  • EU classified CTPV = carcinogen Cat 1B under REACH — banned for EU consumers in 2010
  • Thailand: DIW Annex II lists CTPV as a controlled substance but phase-out is not yet complete
  • No UV exposure (chalk + crack)
  • The market is shifting to 2K epoxy mastic as a replacement

3. 2K Epoxy Mastic (Modern Replacement)

Spec:

  • 2K bisphenol-A epoxy + amine cure
  • DFT 150-400μm/coat
  • Operating temp: -20°C to 120°C
  • Volume solids 75-90% (high-solids low-VOC)

Sweet spot: modern replacement for every Im2 + Im3 application that previously used CTE.

Brand: Hempel Hempadur Mastic 4588, Jotun Jotamastic 90, Sigma SigmaShield 880, International Intershield 300.

Advantages:

  • Safe — no carcinogen issue
  • Low VOC — aligns with the Thai DIW phase-out roadmap
  • High DFT/coat + fast cure
  • Cost competitive — within 10-20% of CTE

Decision Matrix

graph TD
    Start[Marine project Im2] --> Q1{Application area?}
    Q1 -->|Above splash zone
UV exposed| CR[Chlorinated Rubber + epoxy primer
4 coats × 100μm = 400μm DFT] Q1 -->|Splash zone immerse| Q2{TOR specifies CTE?} Q1 -->|Permanent immersion| Q3{TOR cert?} Q2 -->|Yes| CTE[Coal Tar Epoxy
2 coats × 400μm = 800μm DFT] Q2 -->|No| Mastic1[2K Epoxy Mastic
2 coats × 300μm = 600μm DFT] Q3 -->|NORSOK M-501| Mastic2[Hempadur Mastic 4588
3 coats × 250μm = 750μm DFT] Q3 -->|Generic| Mastic3[Jotamastic 90 / SigmaShield
2 coats × 300μm + topcoat] style Mastic1 fill:#10b981,color:#fff style Mastic2 fill:#10b981,color:#fff style Mastic3 fill:#10b981,color:#fff style CR fill:#3b82f6,color:#fff style CTE fill:#f97316,color:#fff

Surface Preparation — Critical for Im2

SSPC-SP10 (near-white blast) mandatory for every system:

  • Abrasive size 35-100μm Sa 2.5
  • Salt contamination test ISO 8502-9: ≤ 50 mg/m²
  • Humidity ≤ 85%
  • Substrate temp 3°C above dew point
  • Recoat window 4 hours max

Do not:

  • Use hand tool prep (SSPC-SP2) for Im2
  • Apply during rain or humidity > 85%
  • Apply over flash rust > 1 hour old

QC + Inspection

  • WFT (wet film thickness) per ASTM D4414 — at application
  • DFT (dry film thickness) per ASTM D7091 (magnetic) — after cure
  • Holiday test per ASTM D5162 — wet sponge low-voltage
  • Adhesion per ASTM D4541 — pull-off ≥ 3 MPa for Im2

Inspector cert: a NACE Level 2 or ICorr Painting Inspector Level 2 must be on site during application + sign off the report.

Further Comparison

See the more detailed tables:

Or calculate 20-year TCO at /tools/paint-tco-calculator.

Saha Service

Saha supplies + supervises marine coating across every system:

  • Material: Hempel / Jotun / Sigma / International / TOA — every Im class
  • Application contractor: SSPC-QP1 + ICorr Level 2 painter
  • Surface prep: SSPC-SP10 abrasive blast + salt test
  • QC: WFT + DFT + holiday test + adhesion + report
  • Documentation: photo of every step + sign-off + 10-year warranty (with Hempel/Jotun spec)

Send your substrate spec + area + Im class + cert requirement → system recommendation + quotation within 48 hr.

Share:LINEFacebook
Free download · no sales call

Get this guide as a reference brief (PDF)

Summary + full section list + standards cited, Saha-branded for your memo/RFQ — emailed to you too.

Your email is used only to send the brief + contact from the Saha team · never shared.

Free consult · real quote within 2 hours

Questions after reading? Talk to our engineers

Tell us what you need — our engineers help you spec it right, with a real quote. No charge.

Or reach us directly:02-096-2118LINE: @sahawatt1988
Related Services

Need help with this in your facility?

Our team handles full procurement and installation for the topics covered in this article. Free quote within 2 hours.

Related content

Article·10 min

Holiday / Pinhole Detection in Coatings — Wet Sponge vs High-Voltage Spark per NACE/AMPP SP0188 & ASTM D5162

A guide to detecting holidays/pinholes (invisible discontinuities) in protective coating films: choosing low-voltage wet sponge (thin film < 500 µm) vs high-voltage spark/DC (thick film > 500 µm) per NACE/AMPP SP0188, SP0490 and ASTM D5162 — setting voltage by DFT (too low misses holidays, too high burns the film), which work requires it (tanks/pipes/immersion/marine), mark-repair-retest, and what a TOR must specify.

Read
Article·11 min

Coating Inspectors: NACE/AMPP CIP vs FROSIO — Who Needs Certification, Levels 1/2/3, and TOR Requirements

A comparison of the two main coating-inspector certification schemes: NACE/AMPP CIP (Coating Inspector Program — Levels 1/2/3, after NACE merged into AMPP in 2021) vs FROSIO (the Norwegian scheme — competence levels I/II/III) — what each level can do, which projects need which level, recognition in Thailand and abroad, and what a TOR must specify (level, independence, hold points, reporting) so coating work can actually be accepted.

Read
Article·10 min

Coating Application Conditions — The 'Surface ≥ Dew Point + 3°C' Rule, RH < 85% per ISO 8502-4 & ISO 12944-7

A guide to environmental conditions during protective-coating application: steel surface must be at least 3°C above the dew point, relative humidity RH < 85% (per the TDS), surface temperature within the product's range — how to measure the 4 readings (air temp, RH, dew point, surface temp) per ISO 8502-4 and ISO 12944-7, why painting in humid/near-dew-point conditions causes peeling/blistering/flash rust, and what a TOR must specify for Thailand's humid climate.

Read
Article·11 min

ISO 12944 Protective Paint Systems for Steel — Selecting Corrosivity C2–CX, Durability, and Primer/Intermediate/Topcoat for Thailand

How to select a protective coating system for steel structures per ISO 12944: corrosivity categories C1–C5/CX (2017/2018 revision), durability ranges L/M/H/VH, matching zinc-rich primer + epoxy MIO + PU topcoat systems to dry film thickness (DFT) per category, mapping to Thai environments (urban plants vs coastal Map Ta Phut/Laem Chabang), and the spec mistakes TOR writers make most.

Read