Cooling tower fill + sump (steel) = magnesium anode (soft freshwater, pH 7-9), 5-7 year life — if brackish or chemical treatment makes the water corrosive, use zinc anode instead — concrete sump + rebar = Concrete Anode the standard model with polarization decay ≥100 mV per the NACE/AMPP KPI
Cooling tower systems are a weak point of corrosion control in industrial factories + data centers — water circulating continuously 24/7, temperatures of 28-42°C, contact with chemical treatment (biocide, dispersant, pH adjust), and constant exposure to atmospheric oxygen, give the sump (lower water basin), fill structure (water-distribution panels), and distribution piping a corrosion rate 3-5 times higher than a closed system.
Using cathodic protection (CP) is a way to extend service life by changing the operating metal from anode (corroding) → cathode (protected) through connecting a sacrificial anode (galvanic) or ICCP (impressed current).
This article summarizes:
- The 3 types of cooling tower structure + the points that corrode most
- Selecting an anode by water chemistry + structure
- Anode sizing + service life + replacement schedule
- An example TOR template for facility / data center procurement
The 3 Types of Cooling Tower Structure + Corrosion Points
Counterflow (Crossflow → Counterflow CT)
- Structure: water drips against the airflow direction — fill is vertical
- Corrosion hotspot: the bottom corner of the sump (water reservoir) + the dry-wet water level (waterline)
- CP approach: Magnesium anode suspended in the sump (galvanic) or ICCP for large towers (>1,000 TR)
Crossflow
- Structure: water drips against the air from the side — fill horizontal
- Corrosion hotspot: lateral water distribution channel + side wall
- CP approach: Multi-anode array — magnesium at 2-3 m intervals
Closed-circuit (Hybrid / Indirect)
- Structure: a heat exchanger separates the process water + tower water
- Corrosion hotspot: exchanger tube bundle (usually stainless but the shell is carbon steel)
- CP approach: Zinc anode at the exchanger inlet + Mg at the sump
Selecting an Anode by Water — Decision Table
| Water Source | pH | Conductivity (μS/cm) | Recommended Anode | Service Life | Standard |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tap water (Bangkok tap) | 7.0-7.6 | 200-400 | Magnesium (Mg-Al-Zn alloy) | 5-7 years | NACE SP0100, ASTM B843 |
| Deep well water | 6.5-7.2 | 300-600 | Magnesium | 4-6 years | NACE SP0100 |
| Brackish well (high Cl) | 7.2-8.0 | 800-2,500 | Zinc (high-purity 99.995%) | 6-8 years | ASTM B418 Type II, MIL-A-18001K |
| Sea water make-up | 8.0-8.2 | >30,000 | Zinc or Aluminium (Al-Zn-In) | 8-12 years | TIS 3359-2563, DNV-GL |
| Treated water + biocide | 7.5-8.5 | 600-1,200 | Zinc (Mg unstable at high pH) | 5-7 years | NACE SP0100 |
| RO permeate (chiller plant) | 5.5-6.5 | <50 | Magnesium + ICCP backup | 3-5 years | NACE SP0388 |
| Soft water + caustic dose | 9.0+ | varies | ICCP only (galvanic does not work at high pH) | 15+ years | NACE SP0388 |
pH rule: Magnesium works best in water at pH 6.5-9.0 — above pH 9 → passivates (MgO/Mg(OH)₂ surface film) → CP stops working; Zinc tolerates up to pH 7-12 but corrodes quickly at pH <6.
Anode Sizing — Calculated by Surface Area + Corrosion Rate
Magnesium (freshwater)
- Current density required: 100-150 mA/m² (steel in aerated water)
- Anode mass: use the rule 5 kg Mg / 100 m² of metal-water surface — for 5 years
- Standard sizes: 5 kg, 10 kg, 12 kg, 24 kg
- Example: Sump 100 m² → 5 kg Mg × 2 points (distributed) = 10 kg total, 5-6 year life
Zinc (salt/brackish water)
- Current density: 50-80 mA/m²
- Anode mass: 8-12 kg Zn / 100 m² — for 8 years
- Standard sizes: 5 kg, 10 kg, 14 kg, 20 kg, 24 kg, 40 kg
- Example: Brackish-water sump 100 m² → 10 kg Zn × 2 points = 20 kg, 8 year life
Aluminium (sea water)
- Current density: 80-120 mA/m²
- Anode mass: 4-6 kg Al-Zn-In / 100 m² — for 10 years
- Standard sizes: 5, 10, 14, 20, 24, 40 kg
- Replaces zinc for sea water make-up work — lighter weight + high EER
KPI for the Acceptance Test — Polarization Decay
Both NACE SP0100 and ISO 12696 use polarization decay (PD) as the principal measure of CP performance:
- PD = the potential difference between "with anode (instant off)" and "24 hr after removing the anode"
- Criterion: PD ≥ 100 mV = the CP system is working
- PD ≥ 150 mV = excellent system
Measured with a Cu/CuSO₄ reference electrode (CSE) for buried structures, or Ag/AgCl/seawater for salt-water work.
Service + SKUs Supplied by SAHA
Sacrificial Anodes (Thai-made anodes, ISO 9001:2015 · supplied + system-designed by SAHA per DNV-RP-B401 / ISO 12696)
| Anode | Material | Common sizes | Application | Standard |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnesium Anode | Mg alloy AZ31B | 5/10/12/24 kg | Cooling tower freshwater sump | NACE, AMPP |
| Zinc Anode | Zn 99.995% | 5/10/12/24 kg | Brackish + treated cooling water | MIL-A-18001K, GL-Zn1 |
| Aluminium Anode | Al-Zn-In | 5/10/14/20/24/40 kg | Sea water make-up + offshore | TIS 3359-2563, DNV-GL |
| Concrete Anode (standard / high-output) | Zn in alkaline mortar pH≥14 | 60/100 cm strip | RC sump + concrete tower fill | TIS 3029-2563, ASTM B418 Type II, ISO 12696 |
Engineering Service (in-house team)
- Site survey + water chemistry analysis — pH, conductivity, alkalinity, chloride
- CP design report — current density calc, anode sizing, layout drawing, BOM
- Installation — anode mounting + reference electrode + monitoring junction box
- Annual inspection + replacement — PD measurement + remaining mass survey
- Annual report per NACE SP0100 — for audit / insurance
TOR Template — Example Spec for Cooling Tower CP
1. Scope of work: Galvanic Cathodic Protection for cooling tower sump + fill
structure of the chiller plant system, building [X], number of [N] cooling towers
capacity [Y] TR/cell
2. Standards:
- NACE SP0100-2008 — Cathodic Protection of Cooling Water Systems
- ASTM B418 (zinc), B843 (magnesium), B418 Type II (aluminium)
- ISO 12696:2022 (for concrete sump)
3. Material specs:
- Zinc Anode: 99.995% purity, conforming MIL-A-18001K + GL-Zn1
- Magnesium Anode: Mg-Al-Zn alloy AZ31B, ASTM B843
- Cable: PVC-jacketed copper, sun-resistant, IP68 splice
- Reference electrode: Ag/AgCl Cl⁻ saturated, 5-year life
4. Performance acceptance:
- Polarization Decay ≥ 100 mV per NACE SP0100 §6.2
- Measure 30 days + 180 days post-installation
- Spot check every 6 months, full survey every 12 months
5. Documentation:
- As-built drawing + anode location + cable routing
- Initial PD measurement report
- Material COA (mill cert) for every anode
- Warranty 5 years galvanic / 10 years ICCP
6. Service life expectation:
- Sacrificial anode replacement ≤ design life ± 10%
- 50% anode mass remaining at mid-life inspection
7. Optional add-on:
- Remote monitoring (PD telemetry, weekly auto-report)
- Annual PM contract + replacement scheduling
ROI — Comparing CP vs no CP
A 1,000 TR cooling tower factory installing CP:
| Item | No CP | With Mg Anode CP |
|---|---|---|
| Sump replacement cycle | 7-10 years | 15-20 years |
| Tower fill structure repair | every 2-3 years | every 5-8 years |
| Annual chemical treatment cost | +25% (offset corrosion) | baseline |
| Anode replacement cost | n/a | ฿60,000-80,000 every 5-6 years |
| Net 15-year TCO | 100% baseline | -28% to -35% |
Insurance benefit: some companies reduce the insurance premium by 5-8% if there is a certified CP system + annual NACE survey.
Recommendations for Data Centers
For water-cooled data centers using chiller plants of 2,000-10,000 TR, we recommend:
- An ICCP system (not sacrificial) — current can be controlled precisely + no frequent anode replacement
- PD telemetry + integration with the BMS (Building Management System) — alarm if PD < 100 mV
- Annual NACE certified inspector survey — for uptime SLA documentation
- Use a closed-circuit tower to separate the process loop + tower loop — reducing corrosion factors at the chiller heat exchanger
This article is an engineering reference — for project-specific CP system design, contact the Sahawatthanakit (1988) Engineering team for a site survey + water chemistry analysis + CP design report with a ready-to-tender TOR.
Get this guide as a reference brief (PDF)
Summary + full section list + standards cited, Saha-branded for your memo/RFQ — emailed to you too.
Questions after reading? Talk to our engineers
Tell us what you need — our engineers help you spec it right, with a real quote. No charge.
Need help with this in your facility?
Our team handles full procurement and installation for the topics covered in this article. Free quote within 2 hours.
Comparison tables related to this article
Related content
4 Sacrificial Anode Types — Concrete vs Aluminium vs Zinc vs Magnesium for Cathodic Protection
Field guide to selecting sacrificial anodes for Galvanic Cathodic Protection — Concrete Anode (standard/high-output) for reinforced concrete, Aluminium (Al-Zn-In) for marine seawater, Zinc 99.995% for ship hulls, Magnesium for fresh water. Standards: TIS 3029-2563, TIS 3359-2563, ASTM B418, ISO 12696, NACE SP0387, DNV-RP-B401.
Designing a Galvanic Cathodic Protection System — Current Demand, Anode Mass & Anode Count (DNV-RP-B401 / ISO 12696)
A step-by-step guide to sizing a sacrificial-anode corrosion protection system — current density by environment, the anode mass formula (M = I·t·8760 / u·ε), anode count from current output, and the −850 mV / 100 mV decay criteria, with a worked example. References DNV-RP-B401, ISO 12696, NACE SP0169 / ISO 15589, ASTM B418.
Zinc Anode / Cathodic Protection — Prices and Contractors in Thailand 2026: A Procurement Guide for Engineers
Zinc Anode, Magnesium Anode and Aluminum Anode prices in Thailand 2026, material comparison tables, ASTM B418 and ISO 12696 standards, and full-service Cathodic Protection contractors.
Galvanic Cathodic Protection for Steel Rebar in Concrete — ASTM B418, TIS 3029, ISO 12696
How Galvanic Cathodic Protection (GCP) embeds zinc anodes in concrete to protect rebar from corrosion under ASTM B418, TIS 3029-2563, and ISO 12696 — with practical guidance for Thai infrastructure projects.
