Sahawatthanakit (1988) Co., Ltd.
SAHAWATTHANAKIT(1988) · Make It Smart
Sacrificial anode comparison

Magnesium vs Zinc vs AluminumChoose the metal by the water it sits in

The three metals this maker casts — Mg for fresh water · Zn for seawater · Al-Zn-In for seawater and brackish. Compared on the figures the maker publishes, including where each one fails.

In short — choose by the water

Fresh water = Mg · seawater = Zn · seawater or brackish = Al-Zn-In. Each metal has water it must not go in — those lines are on the cards too.

Fresh water + condensers

Magnesium (Mg)

  • Highest driving potential of the three, so it pushes current through high-resistivity water
  • The type this maker casts is a condenser anode — bare or plastisol-coated
  • Capacity as published: ≥ 1,100 Ah/kg · efficiency ≥ 50%
  • The maker says it does not belong in ordinary seawater — it is spent quickly and risks overprotection
  • Standard: ASTM G-97
Best for

Fresh water · very brackish water · heat exchangers and condensers

Seawater

Zinc (Zn)

  • Lowest driving potential of the three, so overprotection that lifts paint is rare
  • Cast from special high-grade zinc ingot, 99.995% minimum
  • Capacity as published: 780 Ah/kg
  • The maker says it does not belong in brackish water — a thick oxide film forms and blocks current
  • Standards: MIL-A-18001K · GL-Zn1 · production approved by DNV-GL
Best for

Seawater — hulls · sea chests · anchor chain · the seawater side of condensers

Seawater + brackish

Aluminum (Al-Zn-In)

  • Highest capacity of the three, 2,481 Ah/kg (maker's 12-month free-running test)
  • Warranted design values — ≤30°C: 2,000 · 60°C: 1,500 · 80°C: 720 Ah/kg
  • Less metal for the same protected area, so less weight carried on the structure
  • The maker says it does not belong in fresh water, very brackish water or soil — it passivates
  • TIS 3359-2565 · DNV Type Approval · fits any DNV-classed vessel
Best for

Seawater · brackish water — hulls · jetties · piles · offshore structures

Comparison table — 10 rows

ItemMagnesiumZincAluminum
Current capacity, as published by the maker≥ 1,100 Ah/kg (High potential) · ≥ 1,105 Ah/kg (AZ63)780 Ah/kg2,481 Ah/kg (12-month free-running test)
Design value the maker warrantsThe maker publishes no temperature-banded design valueThe maker publishes no temperature-banded design value≤30°C: 2,000 · 60°C: 1,500 · 80°C: 720 Ah/kg
Efficiency≥ 50%Not published by the makerNot published by the maker
Potential (with the reference electrode it was measured against)Closed circuit 1.57–1.62 V (high potential) · 1.45–1.50 V (AZ63) — vs SCEThe maker states only that it has the lowest driving potential of the group−1,073 mV vs Ag/AgCl in seawater
Water it belongs inFresh water · very low salinity · condensers and heat exchangersSeawater — hulls · sea chests · anchor chainSeawater · brackish — hulls · piers · piles · offshore
Where the maker says it does not belongOrdinary seawater — more driving potential than needed, so it consumes fast and risks overprotectionBrackish water — a thick oxide film forms and blocks the currentVery low salinity · fresh water · buried — it passivates and stops delivering current
Standards the maker citesASTM G-97MIL-A-18001K · GL-Zn1 · DNV-GL (works approval)TIS 3359-2565 · DNV Type Approval · DNV-RP-B401
Size / weightThe maker publishes no size table — quoted per drawingThe maker publishes no size table — quoted per drawingThe maker publishes no size table — quoted per drawing
PriceOn request — it follows the finished weight and the metal price on the dayOn request — it follows the finished weight and the metal price on the dayOn request — it follows the finished weight and the metal price on the day
Service lifeNot published — it follows the anode mass and the current the structure drawsNot published — it follows the anode mass and the current the structure drawsNot published — it follows the anode mass and the current the structure draws

Every figure here is one the manufacturer publishes on its own website; rows it does not publish say so rather than borrowing a number from elsewhere. Sahawatthanakit supplies anodes for water immersion and concrete embedment only — buried/soil cathodic protection is out of scope. Send your water/environment data and structure dimensions and we size it per drawing.

Send water + structure data → sizing + quotation in 48 hours

Saha's engineers compile water/environment data + structure surface area + lifetime target → recommend anode type + quantity + spacing + the mill and approval certificates a TOR asks for

Related comparisons

Decide with confidence — compare from several angles

Read the related comparison tables — full specs, real prices, and a recommendation for each use.

FAQ

Common Questions

Q1.How do you choose between the three anode metals?+
By **the water the structure sits in**, not by soil: • **Magnesium** — fresh water and very brackish water. Highest driving potential, so it pushes current through high-resistivity water. The maker says it does not belong in ordinary seawater. • **Zinc** — seawater. Lowest driving potential, so overprotection that lifts paint is rare. The maker says it does not belong in brackish water. • **Aluminum (Al-Zn-In)** — seawater and brackish water. Highest capacity. The maker says it does not belong in fresh water or soil. **Sahawatthanakit supplies anodes for water immersion and concrete embedment only — buried/soil cathodic protection is out of scope.** If your job is a buried pipe or tank, tell us and we will say plainly that it is not ours.
Q2.Why does capacity (Ah/kg) matter?+
Capacity is the current an anode can deliver per kilogram. The higher it is, the less metal you need for the same protected area. **The figures the maker publishes:** • **Aluminum** 2,481 Ah/kg (12-month free-running test) — warranted design values ≤30°C: 2,000 · 60°C: 1,500 · 80°C: 720 Ah/kg • **Zinc** 780 Ah/kg — at equal volume, aluminium gives about 21.8% more capacity • **Magnesium** ≥ 1,100 Ah/kg (High potential) or ≥ 1,105 Ah/kg (AZ63), efficiency ≥ 50% The maker publishes no theoretical capacity and no annual consumption rate, so we do not print those. Real service life depends on anode weight and the current your structure draws — send the data and we will work it out.
Q3.Which standards does the maker cite?+
**As stated by the manufacturer on its own website:** • **Aluminum** — TIS 3359-2565 · DNV Type Approval (fits any DNV-classed vessel) · DNV-RP-B401 • **Zinc** — MIL-A-18001K · GL-Zn1 · production approved by DNV-GL • **Magnesium** — ASTM G-97 • **Concrete anode** — TIS 3029-2563 · ASTM B418 Type II · ISO 12696 **Documents available on request:** mill certificate + electrochemical test report. If your TOR names a different standard, send it over and we will tell you whether it matches — we will not guess on your behalf.
Q4.Which anode types and sizes does Sahawatthanakit supply?+
Four types — magnesium (condenser anode) · zinc · aluminium (Al-Zn-In) · concrete anode (zinc core in alkaline mortar). **Sizes:** the maker publishes no standard size table, so we do not advertise sizes we cannot guarantee — **quoted per drawing.** Send the size or drawing you need and we will check it with the maker and come back. **Price:** quoted per enquiry, because it depends on the actual weight and the metal price on the day. **Scope:** water immersion and concrete embedment only; buried/soil work is out of scope. Send water data + structure dimensions → type and quantity recommended within 24 hours, quotation within 48 hours.
Q5.Is ICCP better than a sacrificial anode?+
It depends on the size of the structure and whether there is power on site: • **Sacrificial (galvanic) anode** — suits small to medium structures, needs no power supply and nobody to run it • **ICCP (impressed current)** — suits large structures, or conditions where a galvanic anode cannot deliver enough current; needs DC power, a rectifier and someone taking readings The two differ a great deal in cost and it scales with the steel surface area to be protected, so we quote per enquiry only. Send your structure dimensions and site conditions and we will cost both and show you which works out cheaper. See Galvanic vs Impressed Current.
Free advice · a prompt, real quotation during business hours

Still not sure which one fits your job?

Tell us the job in a line — a Sahawatthanakit engineer checks the right rust-protection systems for you free, with a prompt quotation during business hours.

Or contact us directly:02-096-2118LINE: @sahawatt1988

Used only to contact you · never shared with third parties